Rants michael on 11 Mar 2009 08:51 am
So I just read this post on the TSA’s Evolution of Security blog. It’s a short article, go ahead and take a second to read it. Don’t worry, I’ll wait for you to come back.
I know what the author was trying to say with his post - but at the same time I think his post is completely missing the mark and shows a complete lack of understanding about why people hate many of the airport security restrictions. There’s been a lot of discussion about the TSA’s Millimeter Wave machines and the privacy concerns surrounding them - and from what I’ve read the TSA has addressed them pretty well. What concerns me more is that being screened by one of these machines basically means standing inside a giant radar range….
But what really got me about the post was the incident that the author was bragging about. Every traveller wants the TSA to be locating and identifying the concealed objects that folks are trying to sneak past security - but even more than that we want TSA to be identifying and eliminating the objects that pose A THREAT to travellers. It’s great that the concealed item was discovered hidden on the passenger, BUT once that concealed item was determined to be an innocuous container of lotion the passenger should have been allowed to proceed WITH THEIR LOTION! According to the post, the substance that this passenger was trying to smuggle was harmless lotion - the biggest risk to travelers it posed was that if it spilled somebody could slip and fall!
The trouble with 3-1-1 is that it doesn’t identify dangerous substances, it doesn’t even prevent them from getting onboard an aircraft. It just limits how much of a dangerous substance an individual passenger can bring onboard. Sadly like much of the “security procedures” that have been enacted since September 11, 2001; 3-1-1 gives the illusion of security without actually providing any increase in true security. I’m all for practices that will make us more secure and will prevent any type of attack on this nation - but the reality is that short of living in a police state there’s a limit to what we can really do. Many of the “security procedures” that we see or submit to give the impression of increased security without actually making us any safer.
Just to be clear here, some good security measures:
- Screening airline passengers with metal detectors etc… for explosives, weapons and the like.
- Increased police/security force patrols of airports, train stations, bridges etc…
- The Air Marshal program
- Increased inspection of air freight and baggage
Secure measure that look good but don’t really do anything:
- Armed National Guard or Police squads standing at airport security checkpoint in addition to the 5 dozen TSA agents that main that checkpoint.
- Police checkpoints at airport, train station, cruise terminal entries to check id’s of drivers
- 3-1-1
Imagine the progress that we could make if somebody stood up and decided to stop wasting time, money, personnel, and effort on the theater of security measures and instead focused on those things that would truly make us and this nation safer?